Our approach

We use WCAG 2.2 Level AA as our target when designing, writing, and building the site. We have not established that every page or state conforms to that standard.

Review scope and results

In our October 22, 2026 testing, automated axe scans covered 34 pages, including articles scheduled for later publication, and recorded zero violations. The same pages fit at 320 CSS pixels with the site’s fonts loaded and no horizontal page overflow. An earlier October 12 check increased text spacing on the 24 pages selected for launch, also at 320 CSS pixels, with no horizontal page overflow after fixes. These checks do not establish that every device, page state, or assistive technology works as intended.

The scanner could not determine color contrast on the home and contact pages. October 22 human review checked the visible outline lettering, the homepage article heading, and the native select text against their backgrounds; the reviewed colors met the applicable contrast thresholds. The automated results remain marked incomplete, rather than being presented as automated passes. Archived content and educational demonstrations are outside the marketing-site review.

What we check

Our review considers headings, link text, image alternatives, keyboard focus, forms, contrast, small-screen layouts, and motion behavior. Recorded checks include 320-pixel reflow, keyboard operation, contact-form errors and review behavior, and selected contrast examples. Automated results alone cannot establish that a website conforms to WCAG.

What has not been verified

Safari with VoiceOver was confirmed to announce the contact-form error summary. Screen-reader testing remains incomplete: spoken labels, successful-delivery announcements, and NVDA have not been verified. Selected Chrome checks covered forced-colors display, the homepage’s reduced-motion fallback, contact-form reflow at 200% and 400% browser zoom, and the JavaScript-disabled email fallback. We have not tested every page state, browser, or assistive-technology combination.

Examples in articles

Some articles explain deliberately flawed educational examples alongside repairs. Downloads and demonstrations are labeled as examples, not assessments of a client website or part of this marketing-site review.

Report a barrier

Email hello@dirango.com or use the contact form. If you can, include the page address, what you were trying to do, and the browser or assistive technology involved. Please do not include passwords or sensitive records.

Keeping this information current

We review accessibility feedback and revisit these checks when pages or interactions change. We update this page when the test coverage or known findings change.